Australian Charts Implement Ban on AI-Generated Songs

The Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) has officially confirmed that AI-generated songs will be banned from Australian charts. This significant policy shift, outlined in the updated ARIA Charts Code of Practice, is set to take effect on August 31, following its publication on August 28.

ARIA Logo at the 2025 ARIA Awards

ARIA Logo at the 2025 ARIA Awards. CREDIT: Don Arnold/WireImage/Getty

Defining the Boundaries of Human Artistry

Under the new amendments, any musical composition created entirely by artificial intelligence will be ineligible for inclusion in the ARIA Charts. However, the organization has clarified that tracks where human creativity remains the primary driver—with AI serving only in a supportive or auxiliary role—will continue to be eligible for consideration.

The consequences for non-compliance are stringent. If a song is determined to be the product of entirely AI-driven technology, it faces removal from the charts, the withdrawal of any associated accreditations, and disqualification from ARIA Award consideration. Furthermore, artists may be required to return any previously awarded ARIA Number One accolades.

“These changes reflect our intent to remain dynamic and promote the human nature of artistry in what is – to say the least – a rapidly developing space,” said Annabelle Herd, ARIA CEO. “Artists already use AI tools in their work, the Charts can and should evolve to keep room for that, but music generated wholesale by services built on artists’ recordings is a different matter.”

Industry-Wide Response to AI Music

The decision by ARIA aligns with a broader global movement to address the proliferation of synthetic media. Recent data suggests that AI-generated content is increasingly prevalent, with some studies indicating that AI was detected in nearly 40 percent of music released worldwide in a single month. Despite this, consumer perception remains divided, as research shows that a vast majority of listeners struggle to distinguish between human-made and AI-generated compositions.

ARIA is not acting in isolation. Major platforms such as Apple Music, TIDAL, Bandcamp, and SoundCloud have all introduced measures to increase transparency or restrict AI-generated content. From labelling AI-assisted tracks to outright banning music created entirely by algorithms, the industry is clearly prioritizing the protection of human creators.

“The ARIA Charts will always remain a transparent measurement of the music Australia consumes, but a chart that rewards unlicensed AI output would undercut the very basis of the recorded music we exist to represent,” Herd added. “We have worked closely with IFPI and a number of international industry bodies to understand how to best implement these changes in a way that is both clear and future-facing.”

For artists who believe their work has been mislabeled, ARIA has established a dispute process. Creators will have the opportunity to provide evidence demonstrating that their music was predominantly human-made, potentially allowing for the reversal of an exclusion decision.